Midilibre.fr
Tous les blogs | Alerter le modérateur| Envoyer à un ami | Créer un Blog

15/01/2012

Cry Freedom (Cri de liberté)

- Pas de nouveau billet avant le 15 mars -

 

Un petit livre à n'est pas rater pour comprendre le sujèt: L'esprit et la pensée de Krishnamurti, pour nous les soi-disant intelectuelles!!!! ;-)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lire la suite

14/01/2012

Terre et Agricole la base de notre vie.......


Claude Bourguignon - Colloque : "Où va le monde ?" par EuropeEcologie

 

Billit sur le blog de Paul Jorion:

LES DÉFIS DE L’AGRICULTURE DU 21ème SIÈCLE, par Gilles Domenech

A few questions to deepen the political-juridical economic debate.


 

Is the (economic) survival of the fittest constitutional?

It may be difficult to answer this just like that.

The negative side effects of ‘competition’ are not as tangible in a world where relatively few people live. Imagine a world with half a billion people and you can imagine that there is a place under the sun for everyone. In a world becoming ever more crowded, the side effects of ‘mutual competition’ will be ever more apparent.
It might be important to ask several questions:

For whom is ‘mutual competition’ efficient?

For those who already have a head start, the government, the losers, the winners, or the economy in general?

What happens to communication between the government and the people when ‘mutual competition’, which leads to ‘profit and growth’, is the most important social principle?

What does this do to the self-regulating ability of individuals in their interrelations within a society?

Do not people (and companies) become ever more dependent on the government as a result?

What does ‘mutual competition’ do to participation within a society, the independence of each individual and tolerance towards others?

How (economically) efficient is ‘mutual competition’, when you take profit and growth as a starting point instead of people and democratisation?

How democratic is our society if ‘winners’ have more rights than ‘losers’?

How much credibility does the government and the constitutional state have if winning is a more important social (economic) principle than coexistence?

What promotes an individual’s independence in society?

Do we compete against each other or do we create the conditions necessary for individuals to face society’s challenges and share them by participating and learning to co-operate?

Where does competition end and do crime, terrorism and war start, and what roles do politics, the legal system and the individual play in this?

I hope these questions and points of view are interesting for you, as a reader and, more importantly, as a fellow human being.

Best regards,
Peter Hoopman
Roquetaillade – Aveyron         

12/01/2012

Lili

Lire la suite

11/01/2012

Qui suis-je?

Une des questions philosophique - réligieux - ésotérique - scientifique - psychologique le plus importants.

Débat "Bibliothèque Médicis" avec Jean-Pierre Elkabbach, Jean-Christophe Petitfils, Simone Berthière, Jean Michel Délacomptée, Nanette Snoep, Bérénice Levet.


Bibliothèque Médicis : Qui suis-je? par publicsenat

 

 

Des approches différents plus personel et en parlent pour moi même plus "confrontant" et à la même temps il y a une rélation direct entre celle du débat dans la Bibliothèque Médicis et les approches intérieur de nous.

 

Un phrase confrontant de Krishnamurti:

La seule révolution qui tient la route, c'est la révolution intérieur.

 

 

Qui suis-je par Ramana Maharshi

 

Enquete de soi/La recherche de soi-même par Ramana Maharshi 

 

Blog consacré à la vie/pensée de Krishnamurti  ici sur blogs.midilibre.

 

  

10/01/2012

Time is nothing & Matt et Melissa chauffent notre coeur!!!

Time is Nothing // Around The World Time Lapse from Kien Lam on Vimeo.

 

And Where the hell is Matt?   avec Praan Music de Garry Shyman

 

 

The same stream of life that runs through my veins night and day
runs through the world and dances in rhythmic measures.

It is the same life that shoots in joy through the dust of the earth in numberless blades of grass
and breaks into tumultuous waves of leaves and flowers.

It is the same life that is rocked in the ocean-cradle of birth and of death,
in ebb and in flow.

I feel my limbs are made glorious by the touch of this world of life.
And my pride is from the life-throb of ages dancing in my blood this moment.

 

et français:

 

La même rivière de la vie,
Qui coule en mes veines jour et nuit,
Cours à travers le monde, dansante,
En mesures rythmiques vivantes,

C'est la même vie qui souffle l'allégresse,
À travers la poussière de la Terre en caresses,
En incomptable brins d'herbe, en chaque heure,
Et se brise en vagues déchaînées de feuilles et de fleurs,

C'est la même vie qui se berce dans l'océan,
Berceau de l'existence et de la mort, en reflux et en courant,

Je sens mes membres devenir glorieux,
Par le toucher de ce monde animé et radieux,
Et ma fierté est due à cette vie, vibration des âges,
Dansant en mon corps en ce moment.

 

Praan est un poème Bengali écrit par Rabindranath Tagore.
Il a été ensuite adapté en chanson par Gary Schyman.

Titre français : Rivière de la Vie.

 

prit de: http://purple-angel-star.deviantart.com/art/Praan-traduct...

08/01/2012

La mascarade technocrate continu.......

La France veut mettre en place la taxe Tobin/financière, même si l'idée peut être sympatique au début, ça va rien changer au fond.

En bref cette solution technique dans une monde virtuelle/technocrate, c'est pour se donner l'idée aux gens qu'il fond des choses. Mais en bref c'est une grande mascarade bullocrate. Pour mettre le brouillard à eux même et pire à nous! Mais ils ne sont pas conscient de tout celà.........

Alors ne soyé pas trop sévère vers eux/nous. :-) ;-)




 A lire aussi:

Chers terroristes informatiques

 

Une question qui "tue"

 

Quelques questions pour.......... 

 

Pourquoi cette scene?

 

Si j'ai bien compris François Hollande, le PS, veut aussi cette taxe financière. Il n'a rien compris non plus, ni de Marx ni d'Adam Smith et surtout l'intégralité des deux. Mais au moins le PS et Sarko sont d'accord sur quelque chose. ;-)

Malheureusement François Bayrou reste aussi aux côtés des tehnocrates, même si il est façon parler mille fois plus nuancé que Sarko et Hollande.

photo pris de nouvel obs, mais je ne suis pas certain

07/01/2012

Remembering

Lire la suite

06/01/2012

Grand joueurs de foot (12) van Basten

.

 

Lire la suite

03/01/2012

Is there an alternative course?

La version Français se trouve ici.

De Nederlandse versie "Hoe dan wel?" is hier terug te vinden.

Die Deutsche version  "Wie dann?" kann mann hier zurückfinden (ist dass Deutsch?)

==============================================================

 

Enclosure II with the appeal of De Hutte Holding BV versus the Tax and Customs Administration, case number 07 / 2920 VPB 77 21 december 2008

 

What’s the alternative course?

 

Integral (integrated) economy
Today, we are experiencing several crises at the same time, all of which are interrelated below the surface and all of which come down to one and the same synthesising question: How can we co-exist? While the theoretical answer to this question is fairly simple, it is much harder to put it into practice – it takes two to tango. ;-)

A. The foundations of society
A healthy and living foundation for society requires certain conditions that promote life and survival. The simpler these preconditions are, the clearer and thus more effective they will be. What needs do we all share? The need for drinking water, food, clothing, shelter, education and health care. The constitutional state is responsible for these conditions and maintaining the foundation of society while we, the people, are responsible for the practical concretisation of this foundation by working together. In political terms this means solidarity and the ability to share what we have and what we need.

B. The absolute necessity of integrated individualisation
Without integrated individualisation, the foundation of society is doomed. If you understand this interaction, you have the seeds of the pragmatic concretisation of a fairer society within your grasp. No political, social or commercial (market) party (whether majority or minority) can claim the exclusiveness of the foundation of society. That foundation is humanity as a whole and disallows any exclusivity on the part of any single individual. Once the preconditions for the foundation of society have been met, this will automatically create a breeding ground for integrated individualism, which is nothing other than the complete freedom to develop as an individual. This self-development should not, of course, be at the expense of the foundation of society. In political terms, this can be called integrated individualism, integrated liberalism. We can then put the synthesis of the foundation of society and integrated individualism into practice and call it integral economy.

This can be summarised as follows: everyone is an entrepreneur who, through co‑ordination, communication, practical actions and feedback, gradually improves the living conditions of the individual and the collective.

Lire la suite