Scène du Film Syriana avec Matt Damon, George Clooney et Jeffrey Wright entre autres. Je n'ai pas trouvé une version Français. (février 2011)
Phrase clé: "La corruption, c'est pourquoi nous gagnons."
Malheureusement la corruption est aujourd'hui institutionalisé, politiquement, juridiquement et économiqement (sociale), nationale et mondiale, devenu un labyrinth dans laquelle nous se somme perdu, mais pour sortir cette corruption on doit le voir, sans le jugé, voir que nous faissions tous parti de cette corruption. Jugé c'est facile, comprendre et voir sont mille fois plus difficile, parce que ça demande une reconcilliation avec soi-même et le monde dans lequelles nous vivons.
Mais c'est la seule médicine qui nous aidérons de sortir les multiple crises.
Si j'ai bien compris, c'est Martine Aubry qui a dit François est un homme du système!
C'est vrai, mais si nous ne voyons pas que nous faissions tous parti de cette système, comment nous pouvons sortir ou transformer cette système?
C'est ça la problématique politico-économique aujourd'hui, on a besoin de retrouver une base commun, de coopérer, de partager autrement Martine on devient de plus en plus Marine.
Crime good for 2,1 biljion dollars 4 % of total world economy: Illicit money, houw much is out there
Avec les elections pour le moment "sans intérêt" à venir:
Change le mot "guerre" par "concurrence" et demande vous est ce que nous sommes si différents?
Hitler, le chef des conspirateurs nazis jugés maintenant devant vous, disait paraît-il, en parlant de leurs projets guerriers : « Je donnerai une raison de propagande pour commencer la guerre, peu importe qu’elle soit vraie ou fausse. On ne demandera pas au vainqueur s’il disait alors vrai ou pas. Pour commencer et faire la guerre, ce n’est pas le droit qui compte, c’est la victoire. Le droit est du côté du plus fort. »
Un des plaignants lors du procès de Nuremberg
Come you masters of war
You that build the big guns
You that build the death planes
You that build all the bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks.
You that never done nothin'
But build to destroy
You play with my world
Like it's your little toy
You put a gun in my hand
And you hide from my eyes
And you turn and run farther
When the fast bullets fly.
Like Judas of old
You lie and deceive
A world war can be won
You want me to believe
But I see through your eyes
And I see through your brain
Like I see through the water
That runs down my drain.
You fasten all the triggers
For the others to fire
Then you set back and watch
When the death count gets higher
You hide in your mansion'
As young people's blood
Flows out of their bodies
And is buried in the mud.
You've thrown the worst fear
That can ever be hurled
Fear to bring children
Into the world
For threatening my baby
Unborn and unnamed
You ain't worth the blood
That runs in your veins.
How much do I know
To talk out of turn
You might say that I'm young
You might say I'm unlearned
But there's one thing I know
Though I'm younger than you
That even Jesus would never
Forgive what you do.
Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul.
And I hope that you die
And your death'll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I'll watch while you're lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I'll stand over your grave
'Til I'm sure that you're dead.
Sorry to those who waited a long time.
The economic market is not merely a meeting of supply and demand, of goods and services. No, the economic market is also the supply and demand of safety and justice. By isolating ‘safety’ and ‘justice’ in institutes, the awareness that their essence can only be brought to life by individuals will easily fade. The market is also a meeting of politics and the judiciary and if these do not integrate within the market of goods and services, protectionism and economic apartheid will be the logical consequence.
Displayed in a diagram, this is as follows:
Financial world/dogmas and conditioning
This is, roughly, the description Montesquieu gave. Then, as now, the financial world was spared. It exists, in fact, as a law unto itself, which emerges clearly in a saying by M.A. Rothschild (1744 – 1812): “Give me control of the financial system and I don’t care who makes the laws.” Or, more recently, as said by head of investment bank Goldman Sachs, Mr Lloyd Blankfein, on 8 November 2009 in The Times newspaper: I am doing “God’s work”.
The diagram below shows how to redress balance and reciprocity in the contract between governments and the people. Here, the financial world has again been subordinated to governments, serving (economic means of communication) society instead of being in an unassailable position above all the parties (above the law) as is the case today:
Rights and duties of man
No individual, country or institution can lay claim to exclusivity – here everyone is “equal”.
day-to-day executive: individuals in society
the integration of the economy into democracy and the latter into the constitutional state
It forces governments and individuals to keep the foundations and the structures as simple as possible and to remain in contact with the ‘essence’ of co-existence, respecting the individual’s essential and responsible role in the whole and trying to reinforce it by giving it meaning.
Because money plays an almost all-defining and simultaneously uncontrollable role, the question is whether we are still able to gain a purchase on a common frame of reference. The cult of the winner that dominates politics, economy and sports represents the gap between people rather than bridging it. This winner’s mentality in our middle-class belief in profit and growth has something unbridled in it, and has no single framework within itself. Profit wants more profit, growth more growth, money wants more money. The winner will always find a way to win.
Hitler, the leader of the Nazi conspirators who are now on trial before you, is reported as having said, in reference to their war-like plans: "I shall give a propagandist cause for starting the war, never mind whether it be true or not. The victor shall not be asked later on whether he told the truth or not. In starting and making a war, not the right is what matters, but victory. The strongest has the right."
One of the prosecutors at the Nuremburg Tribunal
According to the undersigned, this is the dominant logic within the contemporary politico-economic system. War is to be replaced by competition and the extent of injustice is, of course, incomparable.
This brings me to the question whether within the Dutch constitutional state it is presumed that something automatically becomes a social truth if you secure a parliamentary majority for it.
If the answer is affirmative, then this system of justice can neither be independent nor can it function in relation to the whole. A fair trial is then open to all kinds of provisos, restrictions and fears, and there is little room for the spirit of the law, conscience and individuality in relation to the whole.
It is conditioning that rules in that case, often out of fear, and we are not permitted to call it into question. It goes without saying that the issue in this application that is brought before the court goes further than the Dutch government, the undersigned and the European Court. However, the spirit of the law can only be resuscitated if individuals and bodies have the courage to act not only for their own good, but also for the general good.
Est-ce que « la vérité » économique, politique et juridique est elle très profitable au vie quotidienne?
Peut être l'éducation est plus bon marché en Chine?